Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan H. Miller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 05:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan H. Miller

Not notable. Basically a failed politician. Esprit15d 16:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
*Delete "...unsuccessful candidate...lost election..." This doesn't add up to a notable political biography, so it should be deleted as per WP:BIO.  (aeropagitica)  18:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Verification mentioned below sufficient for a change of vote. Can this information be included in the article & make it more useful for a researcher?  (aeropagitica)  23:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep former state legislator. Per WP:BIO members of "national state and provincial legislatures" are notable. Needs to be wikified, cleaned up, expnaded, sources cited. Does not need to be deleted. TMS63112 19:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment the only google hit I get for him is his wikipedia entry.....Jcuk 21:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • He was in public life in the 1970's and 1980's so its not especially surprising he doesn't show up in Google. TMS63112 21:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless verified. If so, then keep it because a state senator cuts the mustard for me. Lord Bob 21:47, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Vote changed to keep per below.
  • Biography from Virginia House of Delegates [1] and speech Ronald Reagan gave supporting him and his running mate for Lt. Gov in 1981 [2]. Sufficient verification? TMS63112 22:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Perfectly. I have changed my vote. Lord Bob 22:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. As a former legislator, he meets WP:BIO. Capitalistroadster 01:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Passes WP:BIO since he's a state legislator. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.