Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanyang badminton team
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. —Mets501 (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nanyang badminton team
This article has no encyclopedic value whatsoever. JNighthawk 16:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Zero Ghit may support speedy deletion.--Jusjih 16:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Couldn't you just have tagged this as db-group? Kavadi carrier 16:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. I have an inkling what this article is about, but in itself it's too incoherent to be saved and the school group it describes isn't really notable anyway. Kavadi carrier 16:49, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- What is db-group? This is my first time calling for an AfD. - JNighthawk 16:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For really awful articles that fit these criteria, you can put one of the speedy deletion templates (also described in WP:CSD to tell a sysop to delete as soon as possible without having to create an Articles for deletion page. This article would be suitable for deletion under criteria #7 of articles, and hence I've put the {{db-group}} template on it to arrange the speedy deletion. Kavadi carrier 16:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you. - JNighthawk 16:58, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For really awful articles that fit these criteria, you can put one of the speedy deletion templates (also described in WP:CSD to tell a sysop to delete as soon as possible without having to create an Articles for deletion page. This article would be suitable for deletion under criteria #7 of articles, and hence I've put the {{db-group}} template on it to arrange the speedy deletion. Kavadi carrier 16:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Clackmannanshireman 17:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
