Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Names of Omagh Bomb Victims

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete - no prejudice against recreation at a later date in a more encyclopaedic form. Reasons to delete (that pesky WP:NOT) were far stronger than reasons to keep ('I think it should be kept', 'weak keep', 'keep although it needs substantial work'. I've dumped a copy in Omagh Bombing/names, if anyone wants to use the information. Proto///type 12:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Now moved to Talk:Omagh Bombing/names per WP:SUBPAGES.--Chaser - T 11:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Names of Omagh Bomb Victims

WikiP' is not an indiscriminate collection of information, this article clearly is. Paul Carpenter 16:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I don't think this should exist as it's own article. I'm not sure if ot would be worthy of inclusion in the main Omagh Bombing article though Ydam 17:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Yes, that's precisely what i was going to say... W guice 17:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I think it should be kept and expanded. There is a page listing the victims of the July 7th bombings in London for instance. Casualties_of_the_7_July_2005_London_bombings I think the page should be similar to that article and I will gladly work towards updating information on the victims and on the medical response to the bombing. AlanMc
  • Comment: if the article can be brought up to the quality of the July 7th article, i.e. include more useful infomation than an unformatted list then I would be willing to vote for keep + rename to remove "names of".Paul Carpenter 14:42, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep as it stands now, but would change to definate keep if improved, as suggested above. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 17:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep: although it needs a very substantial amount of work.GiollaUidir 21:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to main Omagh Bombing article. If it gets expanded sufficiently, it could be split off again. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

That's prob a better suggestion.GiollaUidir 13:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• Merge as above... --Charlesxavier 03:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.