Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naill Coll
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete - Yomanganitalk 08:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Naill Coll
Fails WP:VAIN. Gives no indication of why subject should be deemed notable. Name of subject is misspelt anyway! Pathlessdesert 21:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete A google search shows he is in fact an author of a couple of books, but then I have no idea if those books have ever been bought outside his own family from the information in this article. It's horribly NPOV (e.g. "A esteemed recounteur, he is in much demand socially; he is known to have the ability to brighten up otherwise dull situations" which screams out WP:VAIN per nom), but that could be cleaned up if someone can give evidence of notability. -Markeer 21:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- He's a university lecturer, so I reckon this is a joke article written by one of his students and not a case of vanity (I doubt a university professor would spell his own name wrong!). He has written two books, Amazon rank 381,052 and amazon rank 1,788,627 and there are no Google hits outside of bookshops selling those (not even newspaper reviews) so doesn't appear to be notable. Delete. Demiurge 21:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable and fails WP:V. Jayden54 22:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Also, the article contains three other spelling mistakes, which I feel an educationalist would not make.--Anthony.bradbury 23:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. WMMartin 18:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
