Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naik Mohammedal family of Birote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bucketsofg 04:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Naik Mohammedal family of Birote

Naik_Mohammedal_family_of_Birote (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) -- (View AfD)

Mohammed Obaidullah Alvi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) added by Duja► 14:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Mohabbat Husain Awan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) added by Duja► 14:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

This article is very difficult to read, is about a topic that may not be notable, and may be a copyright violation. It's creator has posted several similar articles also. Academic Challenger 01:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Added Mohammed Obaidullah Alvi to the nom. According to Molvi333 (talk • contribs) (aka Molvi (talk • contribs), apparently), this is an unsourced article about himself, and there are several related articles about his relatives and, apparently, entire family tree. I can't make heads and tails of this. See also: (not AfD-ed this time)
  
  • Dhondi/Kareali language (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (apparently, a member of Pahari languages group, 0 Ghits outside of Wikipedia)
  • Hill News (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (is it notable ?)

• Delete all as co-nominator per WP:COI/WP:AUTO for the start, incomprehensibility, and apparent lack of reliable sources. I am aware of systemic bias which can explain the lack of GHits, but I don't see much in the articles (especially due to huge background noise) that asserts existence of WP:RS. Duja► 14:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all verging on nonsense due to its incomprehsibility. No bias - but unless we can find an expert to explain what is notable about this family or some decent external references this has got to go. Madmedea 16:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all no sources, looks and reads like original research. If I understood the articles correctly (which may be unlikely), they seem like attempts to legitimize the claimed link of certain individuals (or families) to Mohammed.--WilliamThweatt 23:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all they're generally incomprehensible, poorly written (probable literal translations?), and non-sourced. Add in the COI and AUTO & it all ads up to delete. SkierRMH,00:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.