Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minneapolis Snow Exclusion Zone

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. --Rhobite 19:10, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Minneapolis Snow Exclusion Zone

Zero hits for Minneapolis "Snow Exclusion Zone" on google, google news, and google groups. Orphan. I'm reluctant to try to merge/redir anywhere as having no hits or context links make verification challenging. Un-tagged/un-sourced images don't help, either. Using google news search for Minneapolis latest Snow I was able to find an article[1] that agrees it was the latest snow in a season since 1945, but it doesn't use the term or verify any of the other details. Only one hit for "Snow Exclusion Zone", and it's referring to weather in Glasgow. Niteowlneils 02:15, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Neither the article nor Google establishes notability. --Carnildo 08:40, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete reasons as above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:54, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, This doesn't belong here. Inter 14:14, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, Term used a lot in amateur weather forums. Geo-Earth.com, weathermatrix.com and a few others. But I agree the article could be improved on.
  • Note: The above was by User:70.92.183.98, and is that anon's first and only comment. --Carnildo 05:30, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• I live in Mpls., and this is total nonsense. This "event" may have happened, but it certainly is not enough to deserve an article. Delete. Sesel 19:39, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.