Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mina Khel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Marwat. As a reminder, when an article has been merged into another article, it shouldn't be deleted because the GFDL requires that we preserve the version history. Mangojuice^talk 14:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mina Khel

Why Delete. Because according to Wikipedia's policy I had already merged/redirected this small piece on Mina Khel to the main article on Marwat. The unidentified editor has recreated this article to satisfy his vanity. The simple fact that Mina Khel is a clan of Marwat tribe is clearly mentioned in the main article on Marwat. As far as the fact that "Mina Khel were the ruling clan of Marwat" is a highly dubious claim and is in conflict with whatever has been written and researched in the main article on Marwat. -- Marwatt 15:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep No need to delete this article. Mina Khel tribe is the ruling clan of Marwat Tribe, for past 300 years. Beside this, there are many of ten thousands Mina Khels, those must be govena seprate identity. There are many famous personalities in Mina Khels, one i.e. Khan Habibullah Khan reached the position of President, Chief Justice, Chairman Senate, Minister and other vbarious positions. We must have seprate page for this big clan. Merging it with Marwat will be an unjustified action, simply. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by A M. Khan (talk • contribs) 09:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. It seems relevant. Michael 19:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Marwat. Seems to exist purely to push the POV that Mina Khel are the ruling clan. Fails WP:V and is redundant to Marwat apart from the disputed claim. If references for this claim exist they should be included in the Marwat article. Yomangani^talk 22:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Marwat but without the disputed claim which has no reference available. -- Nigar 03:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Yomangani. Blatant POV-pushing. Hornplease 23:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment for Closing Editor. I had already, earlier, merged the main point (exclusing the POV) of this entry to the main article on Marwat.--Marwatt 12:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.