Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microtel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep - CrazyRougeian talk/email 06:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Microtel

Non notable hotel group per WP:CORP. Article created by repeat spammer. The article survived an earlier prod tag. Pascal.Tesson 15:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

• As with Hawthorn Suites, redirect to U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. if that article is kept, otherwise delete. --Allen 15:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, for the same reason I changed my vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawthorn Suites --Allen 04:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There may well be reasons why this is a notable company, but those reasons aren't stated and there has been plenty of time now for the initial poster to have added something.--MichaelMaggs 18:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 11:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Large enough franchise to pass the corp guidelines. This should have appropriate cleanup tags, but I'm not sure deletion is the way to go. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 14:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or delete, as per Allen above. --AlexDW 17:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• keep they may get to be bigger in years to come.  Dure  (T)X(E)X(C) 02:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Their ranking by J.D. Power seems to satisfy WP:CORP. Does reasonably well on the Google test. Eluchil404 03:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.