Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey funston

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Sceptre ^(Talk) 10:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mickey Funston

Incorrect capitalisation of Title. Badly written and non notable person. Also its difficult to tell what its about by reading it.--Light current 00:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nn WP:BIO. 29 Google hits. BTW, the capitalization can be corrected with a page move. Royboycrashfan 00:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as utterly nn. Amcfreely 02:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn bio. Some guy 03:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO, possibly WP:VANITY --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity is not allowed in Wikipedia.--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk)ContributionsContributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 06:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, nn-bio Gu 08:24, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn-bio. --Terence Ong 10:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, move, and rewrite to Michael Funston, the name he is listed under in the Finn Harps F.C. article. It's a clearly notable football team, and I see no problem with players having articles; at least one other (Jonathan Minnock) does. The article is very poor in its present state. ProhibitOnions 12:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite. I agree the article badly needs a rewrite, but: "Sportspeople who have played in a fully professional league" are good per WP:BIO. The team he was playing for at the time the article was written in Ireland's Premier Division of soccer. That's notable. RGTraynor 14:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite per RGTraynor. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• keep and rewrite with move please Yuckfoo 06:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't even understand what its supposed to be : ( BrandUseR 03:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.