Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Zarlengo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Michael Zarlengo
Looks like a vanity article - created by fairly new editors who have been going around creating articles about this person's recent books, the publishing company they have created, and their local church school (and adding links to those articles from more normal articles) - the articles look like adverts. Clinkophonist 19:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
All of his information is veriviable. The publishing compnay and church are real. Check again.
- I'm not questioning the factuality, I'm questioning the notability, and the fact that you shouldn't write articles about yourself, your friends, or your work associates, nor about books you wrote, or theological theories you invented. Clinkophonist 20:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Reagrding the wikipedia entry I made, I am Dallas Theological Seminary student. I was aasigned to read these books, as well as other books on this topic. I also have done a study on the author, as a result I made the entries that are in fact notable.
- Delete per nomination. Articles on the non-notable author (Michael Zarlengo) and his two books have all been nominated for deletion. If the author's article survives, the two books should at least be merged into the main article. Engineer Bob 23:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, walled garden of vanity/minor subjects. If kept, de-wikify the links - it's full of links to irrelevant articles. Stifle (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
