Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tang (afd 2)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 17:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Tang

Not notable enough for inclusion, does not pass WP:BIO in my opinion. Bjelleklang - talk 13:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Holds notable record; media coverage continuing more than a month after the event. [1] Feezo (Talk) 13:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The record makes him notable, and it received a LOT of media coverage. (Caveat: I created the page.) -Colin Kimbrell 14:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Please also note that this is a different Michael Tang than the one who was deleted in March (who was apparently some sort of prank page for a H.S. student). -Colin Kimbrell 14:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a recognized record holder in a significant sport. There shouldn't be any question of deletion. RGTraynor 16:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This Michael Tang is just barely worthy of an entry because of that record. Grandmasterka 18:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep , laughs that's the same thing I thought when I saw the article created. I almost left a note on the talk of "At least he's real." Teke 19:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Notable record holder. Staxringold 12:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, this one.--blue520 12:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.