Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael 'Warble" Finucane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael 'Warble" Finucane

Michael 'Warble" Finucane (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Twice prodded. Plain old WP:BIO concerns. He's an artist. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete- Orphaned article, non-notable subject, and I doubt it can be helped.--SUIT 18:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• The subject matter is non-deserving of an article, soaked with POV and non-encyclopedic in its tone. The fact that this article hasn't even been Wikified to camouflage it from discerning eyes is an insult to us all. Flush this article like a dead goldfish. ◄HouseOfScandal►18:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of WP:BIO notability; was also subject of spam campaign. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete sickeningly written vanity article. Danny Lilithborne 22:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Apalling tone suggests authorship by Finucane or his publicist. Despite my request on the talk page, no refs provided. -- RHaworth 10:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, author has cleaned up some of the most excessive prose, but the WP:BIO issues remain. Kuru ^talk 04:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DrKiernan 12:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.