Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehmet Mustafaoğlu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:08, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mehmet Mustafaoğlu

Non-notable bio. A secondary-level diplomat of a small country is not notable enough for Wikipedia. — Mateo SA | talk 02:25, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and add more cowbell - If it's expandable, keep it. If this is all the info about him, merge it somewhere. --Phroziac^(talk) 06:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: "add more cowbell?" What does that mean? -- Kjkolb 09:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Heh. That just meant to expand it. --Phroziac^(talk) 14:10, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
      • See more cowbell.
• Keep. everyone is "secondary" after President. mikka (t) 06:17, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Looks like there's potential for expansion. In the meantime, I added more cowbell per User:Phroziac. Crypticfirefly 06:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. He's not the president of the universe but IS the representative of a country. And gee, do we really need to continually state that our space is not finite? Moriori 07:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
  • "Our space" may or may not be finite, depending from the shape of the universe. However, Wikipedia is not infinite. Uncle G 16:29, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Neither is Wiki at the stage where we are running out of shelves and need to cull a few books AFAIK. Moriori 21:04, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
      • ... which is not what you asserted above. Read what you wrote above, again. Uncle G 23:09, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
        • Sorry, you lost me. Must have been the extra bottle of red. Moriori 23:21, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A consul is not an ambassador, and therefore not notable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:29, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Government officials are inherently notable. --Nicodemus75 13:55, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, but notable and notable enough to have more then a stub about you aren't the same thing. --Phroziac^(talk) 14:10, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Government officials aren't any more inherently notable than anyone else who has a job, but given his award, his article and his mention in a newspaper, I'd say there's sufficient reason to keep. --Last Malthusian 14:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as cowbelled by Crypticfirefly. Hall Monitor 16:24, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Per the article, this person satisfies the Wikipedia:criteria for inclusion of biographies. Keep. Uncle G 16:29, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This page was started by myself as a good reference example of reprentatives of non-recognized nations. Expatkiwi 18:31, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep obviously. --Ezeu 21:39, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per reasons given by Uncle G and Expatkiwi -- LiniShu 21:57, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep please it seems notable to me but that is just my opinion Yuckfoo 05:27, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - CHAIRBOY (☎) 00:25, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep cowbell is good. Alf ^melmac 06:59, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.