Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meh

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was DELETE. On 29 Dec 2004, User:SimonP deleted it, but didn't close this vote. Perhaps the process was different back then. Anyway, I've deleted it again. dbenbenn | talk 03:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Meh

Dicdef. Fredrik | talk 04:31, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Fredrik | talk 04:31, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Bah. Samaritan 04:44, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Or if we must deal in monosyllabic interjections, shoo! [[User:Livajo|Ливай | ☺]] 06:55, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. if anything - wiktionary. Xtra 08:22, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Meh. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:17, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. dicdef. utcursch 09:51, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
• More monosyllables: Bye! Gone! Toast! Meh! In conclusion: Gee, that was fun. - Lucky 6.9 19:54, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Monocruft. =P Delete. Better - gruntcruft. [[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]] 02:50, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, this is what Wikipedia's good at. Imagine a collection of millions of quality articles on obscure bits of linguistics like this from various languages. Everyking 05:36, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Feh (delete). Edeans 06:59, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Is it possible to move this to wiktionary or something? It already has "Bah" User:220.240.179.187

• If it's a dictdef, then surely a move to Wiktionary would be the appropriate action rather than an outright delete? That's my vote. Bryan 21:09, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Concur. Kappa 02:58, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Aye. --L33tminion | (talk) 04:14, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism, maybe. Internet slang, sure. Typographical error? Okay, who is using a Dvorak Simplified Keyboard? SWAdair | Talk 09:23, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Strong delete. This article is complete, utter rubbish. — JIP | Talk 12:41, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Or move to wiktionary. -- Joolz 14:25, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Or move to Wiktionary, or at least group this under something like internet slang. Cctoide 15:15, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

We definitely need to keep this article. This is what people come to Wikipedia for. Random stuff. If nobody else keeps track of these sorts of things who will? After all, this word was highlighted in the Simpsons.

We should certainly keep this article, or at least move it to wiktionary. The above user is right, this is what people come to Wikipedia for! I myself only found this article when searching for some definite meaning of the word 'meh'. perhaps the blatant advertising is a bit too much however.

• Delete. The current content of this page does not provide sufficient useful information about this "word". Having a look through the history of the page, I find it highly unlikely that it will in the future. The fact that someone commented out the "This article is being considered for deletion ..." box also gives me a negative impression of the page. --TheParanoidOne 19:59, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.