Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Archieri 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Kill it with fire. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 16:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maurice Archieri

Maurice Archieri (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Previous AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Archieri

No references establishing notability. What separates this antipope from the hundreds of other kooks claiming to be the pope? Psychonaut 23:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless substantial references provided to establish notability. Stifle (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid64 19:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, fails WP:BIO. Being a self-proclaimed antipope is not inherent notability. --Dhartung | Talk 20:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

>> I'm new - I don't know how to do this, but please keep this article. I was doing research on Antipopes and found Maurice mentioned by: Why We Oppose Papal Claimants © 1999 by Robert F. Hess, Editor, the Saint Francis Newsletter:

Fifth in line is the Frenchman, Maurice Archieri, who goes by "Peter II." He is either in Paris, or one of its suburbs. His assistant priest originally wouldn't discuss with me who ordained and consecrated his pope. Archieri, according to his web page, was mysticly given the Papacy in 1995 "by operation of the Holy Spirit." (His web site now includes a section on the episcopal lineage of Archieri. It goes back into what appears to be Old Catholic lines.)

I wanted to learn more, so I looked Maurice up in Wikipedia. His own site is in French, so that is of limited help. That is the only reference I have at hand.

Are there "hundreds" of other people claiming to be pope? I don't know of very many. And if there are "hundreds", so what? IF they all wanted to be listed in Wikipedia, is Wikipedia unable to handle it? I guess I don't see the harm in listing it.

But, again, I'm new here and I really didn't open an account to get into these kinds of debates.

Best wishes to all BenedictX 17:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.