Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kaeberlein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, but let WP:CP handle it as probably copyvio. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Matt Kaeberlein

I am quite sure the text is a copyvio (article contains reference to a photo which isn't in the article). First, I thought about speedying it as a blatant copyvio, but the criterion demands that an online source is located and I haven't found one. Then I thought about speedying it under A7, but the article says "...he helped pinpoint the central gene that controls aging in brewer's yeast." and "he is now vice president, as well as a co-founder, of Longenity.". So I couldn't speedy under that either. Then I thought about bringing it to WP:CP for the slow copyvio deletion route, but without a source located, I had some trouble doing that as well. So AFD it is, this reads like a newspaper in-depth report and not an encyclopedia article, and I don't really think Matt Kaeberlin meets WP:BIO guidelines either. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:15, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete --Rogerd 07:22, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• The article is a copyvio as there is a bit on the bottom claiming "Ingfei Chen, a writer in Santa Cruz, California, is waiting for her own head-clobbering epiphany." The text is from a Science of Aging Knowledge Environment article from 2002 written by Chen on Kaeberlein which is not available online for free via public access see [1]. Delete as copyvio but article could help to establish notability. Capitalistroadster 07:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

PS Our Caloric restriction article links to this article claiming him as a notable researcher in the field so he probably is notable enough to justify an article. Capitalistroadster 11:24, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks for finding a source, I will tag this article as a copyvio, and add a link to this debate. If anyone wants to make a real article before it goes as a copyvio, it can be made a /temp subpage. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.