Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massive Change

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - Liberatore(T) 15:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Massive Change

Advertisement for an exhibition/product/book; see related afd: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Mau Design OhNoitsJamie^Talk 03:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete AdCruft, nn, NPOV, possible vanity. Deizio 17:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joey Roe (talk • contribs). 20:31, 25 March 2006
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 00:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 01:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I made an attempt to re-write the article. --maclean25 04:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Yes, it's an exhibition, but bearing in mind that it is for public institutions (i.e art galleries) I think that it should be considered differently from a commercial work. The subject matter is also quite interesting, and it can serve as a good hook to lead readers to related subjects. Finally, Massive Change has managed to receive some measure of international recognition. Rewrite if needed, to avoid POV and/or vanity, but don't toss it away! (I have no connection to the exhibition or the creator - I just attended the Vancouver showing and found it quite informative.) --Ckatz 01:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Salvage. Notable topic, unfortunate that it is represented by adcruft. The Tom 20:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.