Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Mahler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 19:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mary Mahler

Delete - per nomination. Non-notable bio. Vanity bio placed (apparently) by son. (Look at history.) D.valued 03:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - Article as it stands is possibly slightly POV, but otherwise asserts notoriety happily. She has been interviewed twice on major media (per refs), and is a senior executive on the US Social Security Administration. I see no reason why this should be deleted. Whilst I note that it was written by Dmahler, who may or may not be her son or otherwise related to her, I don't see why that has any relevance to the article. Also see her husband: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vincent_A._Mahler, who, for the record, I voted to delete. Others may disagree. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 15:47, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep. I took a closer look at the 'Google' hits. [1]. PJM 16:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Why not? She's reported about a lot. And by the way, you gave AOL search :) Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 16:51, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

I know...I use 'Google' sometimes as a generic term, but AOL search is "powered by Google". PJM 00:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and expand. Seems to be important lady who deserves inclusion here. Submission by son is not relevant. -- JJay 18:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.