Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Belton (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Belton

Mark Belton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Please see the prior AfD; an overwhelming majority voted for delete but the discussion was ignored for procedural reasons. Sdedeo (tips) 03:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Further comment the nominator of the prior AfD was User:Aqua Nation who is currently a banned sock of User:JB196. Signed Jeepday 03:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Vote Delete searches on BBC news and Google News come up empty. The single reference on his site may or may not bea Primary source (not my field), and does support the claims to titles given. I would change my vote with more references and proof of notability. Jeepday 03:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think that prior AfD should have been a case to invoke WP:IAR. --Wafulz 04:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:BIO for sportspeople due to lack of reliable sources. MER-C 05:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 08:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  • delete per all above —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oo7565 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/r/t/Wikipedia%7EArticles_for_deletion_Mark_Belton_%282nd_nomination%29_c24b.html"