Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjorie Pay Hinckley

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus); merged and redirected. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 16:41, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Marjorie Pay Hinckley

Not notable in her own right. Merge into article on her husband? RickK 21:30, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and expand. Her position as the spouse of a leader of a major religion put her in a position to have an impact of her own. I'm not a historian and cant' really come up with any examples, nor do I currently feel inclined to research the topic, however I'm certain that this stub can be expanded and made encyclopedic. Arkyan 01:06, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Major Wife of Religious Figure. Brigham Young, said that women were Utah's greatest resource, and has faithful mormon's they husband thier resources. Klonimus 03:54, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, because someone is married to someone notable does not make that person inherently notable. This issue has been discussed before. Megan1967 08:08, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, being related to a notable person does not make you notable. Article doesn't establish any kind of notability, and Klonimus's claim is pure speculation. Radiant_* 08:19, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I see nothing here to indicate that she is important in her own right. Indrian 03:58, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Ejrrjs | What? 22:46, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.