Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnus Vaughan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:04, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Magnus Vaughan
"Magnus Vaughan" is not notable or does not exist (no google hits). Reads like a joke page, anyway. Sandstein 20:21, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
I do exist. I am 25 and I do live in Slough. I'm glad you think that because my life contains humour, it must be a joke, I cannot be googled, vis a vis I do not exist. You need to leave the house more. Magnus Vaughan
See http://www.hillingdontimes.co.uk/archive/display.var.522217.0.horses_for_courses.php for an example of Magnus' powerful work
- Mr. Vaughan, please excuse my suspended belief in your existence. Even so, existence does not constitute notability, and neither does a single newspaper article, powerful as it may be. Please note that vanity pages, even those intended to be humorous, are not allowed on Wikipedia. Sandstein 20:49, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment for those unfamiliar with North and West London and environs: if that was The Times, possibly. If the Hillingdon Times is anything like my local paper from the same group, the Finchley Times, it's a free weekly paper. Nothing wrong with that, but not a very good guide of international or even national notability. Delete joke article. Tonywalton 20:47, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- I would have nominated this for a speedy delete. Al 21:09, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Writing an article for a local newspaper does not make you notable. Average Earthman 21:52, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. --Howcheng 22:59, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. --Lomedae 23:00, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 00:57, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete totally non notable. Secretlondon 05:17, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.