Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie May (dog)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Lily Allen. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-09 09:21Z

[edit] Maggie May (dog)

Maggie May (dog) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article originally {{prod}}ded with: "Not-notable, a stolen dog does not an international outrage (or notability) make.". Reverted by Lilyfan87 (talk • contribs) (spelling corrections, {{fact}} tagging, and wikification reverted as well) without comment.

• Delete. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 13:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to Lily Allen. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 13:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep shes an important dog!!! :). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lilyfan87 (talk • contribs) 07:52, 5 February 2007.

Delete - has Wikipedia really come to this? Sigh. Akradecki 14:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and pass me the valium. I'm hysterical Madmedea 16:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete So bleedin' what? Totnesmartin 17:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment This dog isn't even in the Lily Allen article. Totnesmartin 20:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• Merge to Lily Allen. C2r 20:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge to Lily Allen per all above.--WilliamThweatt 23:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or merge to Lily Allen. Celebrities' pet dogs might merit mention in their owners' articles, but shouldn't have their own articles. And yes, as far as I'm concerned that should go for Tinkerbell, too. Bearcat 00:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • [in raspy voice] And Toto too! Akradecki 04:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete do I really need to give a reason? JuJube 04:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This isn't wikipeoplemagazine. I can't think of a single dog whose kidnapping would cause "international outrage". Unless this was the subject of a major UN resolution, I see nothing notable about this dog that is even worth merging into another article. Agent 86 20:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into Lily's article. Everyking 07:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• After being nudged by Lilyfan87 (talk • contribs), delete - not an individually notable "thing". Thanks/wangi 23:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge it made the BBC news but it's only notabe in relation to Lily Allen. Mallanox 01:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge - won't hurt to keep all two lines of the article in the Lily Allen article. DB (talk) 04:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.