Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Country Day School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Please defer merge discussion to article talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Madison Country Day School

Primary schools are generally not notable, generally it is only high schools that are listed. I find no reason why this school has any reason to be listed based on its notability. It also fails the proposed guideline WP:SCHOOL. TheRanger 23:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails to assert notability.--Húsönd 03:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Does not meet WP:SCHOOL. Catchpole 06:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Verifiable and notable. Merchbow 15:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• Please explain how its notable you have left same reply on several AfD's without details.TheRanger 19:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

• Merge with the school district page per WP:SCHOOLS. — RJH (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge due to lack of content. Cynical 11:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all enduring public institutions. --Centauri 14:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. This is an unreasonable position, as it implies having a Wikipedia article for every DMV office. Here, this user incredibly claimed to favor that. Pan Dan 22:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge. Do not keep. Vegaswikian 21:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, not super notable but the school exists and is verifiable. All schools have some encyclopedic value. bbx 15:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Which standard shows that this school has encyclopedic value? I have been unable to find anything in news sorces to cite on this school at all. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheRanger (talk • contribs).

• Keep per Centauri and bbx. --Myles Long 17:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all schools are notable to their community, notability is a relative term and not a valid deletion criteria, verifiability is (and its also not something thats relative... it either is or it isnt).  ALKIVAR™ 17:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • (1) "Notable to their community" has nothing to do with encyclopdic notability. (2) Non-notability is a valid deletion criterion, otherwise we wouldn't have guidelines like WP:CORP or WP:BIO. Pan Dan 22:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• By analogy with aforementioned guidelines WP:CORP and WP:BIO, which require multiple non-trivial sources featuring the subject, and having actually looked for sources myself and coming up empty, I say delete. (This school even fails the excessively permissive proposed guideline WP:SCHOOL.) Pan Dan 17:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep for reasons which are explained at User:Silensor/Schools (see also User:JoshuaZ/Schools if interested). Nominator appears to be repeatedly and conveniently ignoring the fact that WP:SCHOOLS suggests merging, not deletion, in borderline cases. Silensor 19:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • You misunderstand the nominator's rationale for deletion. It's based on non-notability, not on WP:SCHOOLS. He mentions that the school fails the criteria of WP:SCHOOLS only to bolster the argument for deletion, as those criteria are perceived as being overly inclusive. Pan Dan 21:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• keep please per silensor it is notable and verifiable too Yuckfoo 21:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.