Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madfrog
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 04:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Madfrog
Article was nominated for speedy deletion but doesn't qualify, since the article does assert notability. That's why I'm putting it up here. No vote. Aecis Mr. Mojo risin' 13:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, so what if he's a notable Warcraft III player. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 14:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, notable. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-31 14:17Z
- Delete Warcraft player. This would be a speedy in my book, actually. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, the article states that he is a professional player and a world champion, which meets WP:BIO. Aecis Mr. Mojo risin' 17:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not notable ENOUGH. — CJewell (talk to me) 17:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Latinus 20:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- He meets WP:BIO and isn't notable enough? Pah. Keep Jcuk 20:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, I guess he does meet WP:BIO. I'll eat my previous words about no amount of gaming being notable ... Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 21:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep if sufficiently cleaned up to cite some source that shows his wins/contract as a pro player. Kusma (討論) 01:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as notable. I cleaned it up a little and added some refs. Google for "+madfrog +warcraft" gives 30,000+ hits. Turnstep 03:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per adrian. —This user has left wikipedia 18:54 2006-02-05
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
