Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mack 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mack 9

Delete. Does not meet WP:MUSIC. Previously prod'ed by Jahiegel; notice removed with no reason or claim to notability given. Possible hoax or exaggeration (born in 1988 and has multiple children... in Surrey, BC?) discospinster 16:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. The page "Mack 9" has been worked on by a couple of people who have close ties to the rapper. Unfortunate for him, not everyone is friends with him and people like to create havoc. Most of the page is correct and those items that are incorrect and being attempted to be corrected ("...father of mandeep..." "...multiple children...") It would be beneficial to allow for his page to be corrected and not deleted due to reasons beyond the rappers control. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Krack3rdud3 (talk • contribs).
  • See WP:OWN. Verifiable info that may not be flattering to the rapper is allowed. Ardenn 04:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• "Mack 9 released his official debut album, titled "Premature", on Friday, June 17th, 2005, at 11:50am... To date, Premature has sold 39 copies, with the album still available for purchase today." He's no, uh, White Dawg. Delete. Samaritan 03:23, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, does not appear to satisfy WP:MUSIC. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

In accordancee with "Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop); note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability" from WP:MUSIC the site is eligable to be kept up. It follow the "...most prominent representative of...the local scene of a city..."

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.