Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOWL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 08:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MOWL

Probable hoax acronym. No relevant google hits & lack of references also indicate that it is unverifiable. Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 05:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. --Alphachimp ^talk 06:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom - ridiculous acronym.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. I can't find any articles either. --Starionwolf 06:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 08:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, made up term - TB 15:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If he doesn't mention Perl, PHP, or Python, how can it truly be a mess of web languages? I call shenanigans. - Corbin ^{Be excellent} 17:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it's got that hoax kind of smell :-) —Mets501^talk 02:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete clarification: no RELATED google hits, except Wikipedia. no refs. Ah well; at least it makes sense. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 22:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Clearly someone's made-up acronym. Grandmasterka 02:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Never heard of until now and I develop web applications. RedWolf 22:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.