Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOJO Works

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as nonsense, and an apparent attack on this company. Ral315 (talk) 11:17, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

After concerns that this nomination was tainted by GNAA votes, I've relisted this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOJO Works 2. All the votes as below have been copied to the new entry, but may or may not be counted by the closing admin. Ral315 (talk) 18:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MOJO Works

Non-notable advertising corporation, what makes them any different from 3000 other internet advertising businesses? Timecop 06:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete please -- Femmina 06:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete We really need to get rid of these non-notable stub articles. There are way too many. Cptchipjew 06:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, no notability claimed. Flyboy Will 08:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. In addition the links to companies are pipe links to spam and spyware. --Quarl 08:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above VegaDark 10:38, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.