Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mário de Andrade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY KEEP. — JIP | Talk 18:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mário de Andrade

• Delete No one cares about this LSEditor 04:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  • AfD uncompleted by LSEditor. Speedy keep, bad faith nom. --Apostrophe 16:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. This is a featured article tagged for AfD by User:LSEditor (currently blocked for vandalism) because it is linked to from the articles created list on my userpage, as revenge for an AfD I posted. Incidentally, I think Jwestbrook was quite right to remove the AfD tag, in the spirit of WP:IAR and WP:Be bold. Chick Bowen 16:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, clearly meets criteria for notability, possibility of bad faith nom. | Klaw ¡digame! 17:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Seems notable enough, as per above. DeathThoreau 17:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep just trying to cleanup after User:LSEditor  J\/\/estbrook       17:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• comment thanks :)  J\/\/estbrook       17:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep likely bad faith nomination. Clearly a worthwhile article. CarbonCopy (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep notable, encyclopedic, well written article. --אריאל יהודה 18:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.