Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luwayne Glass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Luwayne Glass

Hoax. Nothing on Google except this page and its mirrors. "Emerged from the ruff" with "over 100 demos" of electronic music in 1916? Released 17 albums "in the 1920s"? There weren't albums in the 1920s, just 78s. This should be deleted along with the separate pages that the same author is creating for "Glass"' "works":

• Mzunguko wa Nyota
• Nguzo za Uislamu
• Enchini ya Moshi
• Kingama siku
• Sinza (Lima Dunia)
• Sinza (CHEYO)
• Body (album)
• Mwenye genge
• Ania: vikombe vya simu (double LP)
  

NawlinWiki 01:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• • Creator User:Dreamcrusher5 has now moved the page to Luwayne Glass discography with the comment (moved Luwayne Glass to Luwayne Glass discography: He has an extensive discography, many of which i am finding as i look through my vinyls and 8-tracks. I know it seems like its false information, but it isnt.). Sorry dude, you have to do better than that. NawlinWiki 01:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. At worst, it's a hoax. At best, it's non-notable. Aplomado ^talk 01:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This has to be a hoax. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RedRollerskate (talk • contribs).
• Delete as big-time hoax. Aside from the fact that 'Zimbabwe' as a political entity did not exist until 1980, that it's former incarnation as 'Southern Rhodesia' was an English-speaking country (so why would anyone create an artistic work in French?) etc. etc. Eddie.willers 01:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete hoax or really, really nn. Also replaced AFD tag which was removed by User:Dreamcrusher5, the article's creator. Since Dreamcrusher also moved the article, this discussion now points to a redirect. I've never seen an article moved while on AFD before, so I'm not sure if the link should be fixed or left as is. -- Vary | Talk 02:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete verifiably false as per Eddie.willers. Danny Lilithborne 03:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:HOAX. --Coredesat 04:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a WP:HOAX article for reasons given above.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:HOAX. —Khoikhoi 04:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Further Evidence of WP:Complete Bollocks. If the first true 'electronic musical instrument' was the theremin of 1919, how was such music produced in Africa in 1916? If the first 'electric' disk recordings date from 1925, how was it possible to produce 100 'demos', in Africa, on acoustic equipment? Why do some folk think they can get away with bullshit like this? Eddie.willers 05:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. --Terence Ong _{(talk | contribs)} 05:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:HOAX, no evidence of this person at all. Jammo (SM247) 05:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, the lot and speedy any pages he creates related to this that aren't already listed here. Hoax. - Motor (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all as hoax, per nomination. Normally I hate mass noms, but in such an obvious case of WP:BALLS, I think it is wholly appropriate.--Isotope23 12:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Xyrael ^T 14:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete hoax. Skyraider 01:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable/hoax. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-06-18 05:35Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.