Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunch bunch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, afterwhich let's go for lunch together. ;) - Mailer Diablo 04:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lunch bunch

Lunch bunch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is my first time doing this, but I think I have a good reason. This article seems to be a definition of a word. Being switched to the dictionary version of Wikipedia is a great idea, but what's the need for it anymore on Wikipedia? Wikipedia is not a dictionary! Threemillion 17:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NEO. ^Khukri 17:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Move or expand. I think a page with a list of lunch bunches would be helpful. (A lunch bunch is a group of people who commonly eat together) The info on this page would be included, but it would definately have to be expanded. 11kowrom 18:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Oh no. Oh god no. In other words, delete per WP:NEO and because if kept this will turn into an unrferenced indiscriminate mess of a list of supposed "lunch bunches" who have nothing in common. Otto4711 18:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• I nominated this for deletion, but to prove my point further, this seems like a phrase only used in certain communities. see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day Threemillion 20:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. per nominationJulia 20:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC).
• Delete or transwiki to Wiktionary per nom. --Dhartung | Talk 23:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Rapidly Terminate with Extreme Prejudice. As per above. --Action Jackson IV 05:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no transwiki. Wiktionary isn't intended for slangy stuff like this (nor is Wikipedia), that's what urbandictionary.com is for. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 05:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.