Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lothlorien Hall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. —Larry V (talk | contribs) 04:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lothlorien Hall
I'm willing to be proved wrong but at the moment I can see no clear indication of notability in this article. All the sources mentioned seem to be in some way connected with the USCA organisation. Fails WP:Notability--Edchilvers 13:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - no assertion of notability. Moreschi 13:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Just a rambling essay. Akihabara 13:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Also see related nomination at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lothlórien_Co-op Irongargoyle 19:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - nn corp/building/entity. SkierRMH,07:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Don't Delete Most wiki articles read like "rambling essays." This article is not related to the other article of a similar name, other than that the two articles both describe organizations within buildings that have had a historical and artistic impact (whether one thinks it good or bad) on their communities. It doesn't recommend the reader to adopt their policies and practices, but because of the radicalism they appear to identify with, I think alarms are sounded in the more moderate editors before the article is taken into perspective. My suggestion is that the article cite the impact of the co-op on local event and its appearance in media, documentaries and fiction. TeamZissou 04:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Don't Delete Here is some evidence of notability, i.e. an article in the UC Berkeley Daily Cal newspaper: http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=19542 lukasc,13:10, 15 December 2006 (PST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
