Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Slow Distance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 17:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Long Slow Distance

Long Slow Distance (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is not a notable article. Besides, training methods that were even more widely used (crash training, for example), were deleted on the grounds that they weren't notable articles. Farside6 22:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - a quick google search finds a lot of articles from running magazines that address this subject. Appears notable. The nominator's opinion that is not "not notable" is unsupported by evidence and the comparison to other training methods is vague and irrelavent. Tarinth 23:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I would agree that there is little on this page. It needs to be developed. LSD is really more of a running ethos, than a training method such as crash training. A living example of this can be found at the Honolulu Marthon Clinic which I believe still meets every Sunday morning. When I have a little more time I plan to add to the page. Joel Mc 09:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.