Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logically inevitable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Royboycrashfan 13:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Logically inevitable

Orphan since October 2005, found via Special:Random. This article doesn't make sense to me. "Logically inevitable" gets under 800 Google hits, so it's not an important legal concept or anything. Melchoir 05:57, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• A "what...the...hell...?" and a delete That made no sense to me either... Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 06:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Is the scope of this article not already covered in Consequentialism? Possible redirect, if required.  (aeropagitica)  06:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, the article makes no sense at all. --Soumyasch 06:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Deletion is inevitable. Feezo (Talk) 06:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as nonsense. Failing that, Delete as (incoherent) Dicdef. Peter Grey 06:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep BJAODN What, you don't understand that a logically inevitable action or result is something that cannot be avoided unless significant action is taken to stop it. These actions, being logically inevitable are similar to what happens when you take a breath, e.g. something that has a result so predictable as to be certain in happening. For instance, if i were to breathe then, unless somehow something stops them, my lungs will expand and then contract as the air passes through. This is logically inevitable.? T K E 06:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks for finding that, Melchoir. T K E 06:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Ja! Melchoir 06:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• It is logically inevitable that I say delete. "...something that cannot be avoided unless significant action is taken to stop it." -- does that make sense to anyone? Fagstein 18:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete bjaodn ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 00:02, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - irredeemable. Metamagician3000 05:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This article makes sense to me, although badly written. The American Heritage Dictionary uses the phrase but that doesn't stop this from being a dictdef. If I keep flipping a coin, I will eventually get heads, Entropy and heat death, etc. Kotepho 11:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.