Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lobita Blanca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD^e✉ 00:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lobita_Blanca

It is unnecessary and a waste of space. The number of people who would visit or care about this article is insignificant. Fancruft. Some guy 00:02, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as NN fancruft. Devotchka 00:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

It's also meaningless to anybody except a player, and they have other resources to keep "information" like this. Tim.

• Detele obscure tactic of some game. Perhaps the author could consider the the article for the game warrants mention of this element, but it certainly does not need it's own page.Dxco 00:20, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. -- NSLE _{(Communicate!)} ^<Contribs> 01:10, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for obvious reasons mentioned above.
• Delete fancruft. Should we add "Wikipedia is not a cheap GameFAQ.com knockoff" to WP:NOT? --Clay Collier 06:58, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • If we do, it'll probably get deleted by gamers, just as "Wikipedia is not a game guide or FAQ" was. 205.247.102.130 20:18, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN fancruft. And yes, Clay Collier, I'd vote for that! - Just zis Guy, you know? 08:39, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Fancruft, Stu 12:22, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Comment article is an orphan.Geni 15:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Can't see how this article is relavent to an encyclopedia. KnowledgeOfSelf 01:08, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Why do people insist on putting this stuff in? Newyorktimescrossword 19:17, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.