Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lo-mein code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 22:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lo-mein code

Has exactly one google hit for "Lo-mein code" in a short story archived here [1] Ruby 04:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Fightindaman 04:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable neologism. I was thinking of AfDing this myself, but I wasn't sure if it was necessary, and I didn't feel like doing all that work. --Rory096 04:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Rory. --Kinu 05:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable neologism. Royboycrashfan 05:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Lockley 05:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn .Blnguyen 05:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn per nom. Essexmutant 10:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Elfguy 14:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-02-08 15:38Z
• Delete per nom. Avi 16:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 22:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Spaghetti code (or Delete -- one hit is really pathetic). Ewlyahoocom 19:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.