Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveProcess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 04:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LiveProcess

Found nothing on this product, aside from the company's own press releases. ccwaters 20:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Please reference http://www.GHA.org that is the website of the Georgia Hospital Association. They are a current customer of LiveProcess. One of the reasons that I feel so strongly that it needs to be on Wikipedia is because it is somewhere people go for information they trust. The purpose of this is to make them aware that this is out there.

Thanks,

Joe Simonovich Jsimonovich@liveprocess.com 21:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsimonovich@liveprocess.com (talk • contribs).

Also, here are some links to articles about LiveProcess:

http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=2BF66D5C-92B9-437D-B455-F0378C98D536

http://www.healthcareitnews.com/story.cms?id=4491

Jsimonovich@liveprocess.com 21:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete in its present form. Article reads like an ad, and the author's comment above about the purpose for this being here is clearly advertising. That being said, the concept is an interesting one, and a viable article could be written from a non-product perspective on the general need for unified languages. Akradecki 22:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Changing to Keep per cleanup noted below. Nice job. Akradecki 16:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

This article has been totally revamped as of 9/1/06 to better fit in with other Wikipedia articles on software procucts. Please review. Thanks. Jsimonovich@liveprocess.com 13:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.