Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ley lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE. Herostratus 22:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of ley lines

Not really a list, even less an article. For sure unreferenced. --Pjacobi 13:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I don't see the grounds for deletion. It just needs editing. --Mereda 14:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:NOR? --Pjacobi 14:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep though not really a list. Plenty of documented work on ley lines even if it is a rather "alternative" subject. However the article really does need some work. I guess it could be a merge with parent article but that would make that unwieldy Nigel ^(Talk) 15:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:V and (apparently) WP:NOR. There are 2 citations in this article; one is a dead link and the other makes no mention of the term "ley lines" in relation to the location listed. If this somehow get's sourced before the close of the AfD, someone hit my Talk Page and I will reconsider, but right now this isn't referenced and has been tagged since April 20th, 2006. I think that is a reasonable enough time to allow for supporting citations to be added. I can't even support a merge at this point because that would add unsourced info to another article...--Isotope23 16:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - concur with User:Isotope23 -- Whpq 16:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Please keep. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.196.47.186 (talk) .
• Delete per Isotope23. Dlyons493 Talk 20:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge to Ley line, which could use some examples. List serves a purpose as an example list for Ley line, where it is the first item in the "See Also" section, however it serves that function fairly poorly in my eyes. GRBerry 03:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment, this should really only be done if the article is sourced though.--Isotope23 03:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.