Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gaming crossovers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:NOT is most certainly a grounds for deletion. Daniel Bryant 04:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of gaming crossovers

List of gaming crossovers (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Was going to merge to Gaming crossovers but I guess a full debate might help in cementing that choice. Seems to me like the list is trivial and pretty close to indiscriminate information, not to mention original research. Of course, one problem with the merge is that the list is bound to reappear as part of the gaming crossover article... Pascal.Tesson 17:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Pascal.Tesson 17:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Pascal.Tesson 17:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Companies do this all the time. This list could never be maintainable, and it's unlikely reliable sources can be found for most of them (especially since they're often Easter eggs meaning they may not be covered in the manual or other official publications). Garrett^Talk 02:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: I can see how it is difficult to maintain, but this is not grounds for deletion. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 07:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Aside from being unmaintainable, the list is simply a collection of insignificant game trivia and easter eggs, which goes against WP:NOT. --Scottie_theNerd 09:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing on the list is anything more than trivial. The only "true" Gaming Crossovers are Kingdom Hearts and Smash Brothers, and those two alone are not reason enough to maintain this list. Cheers, Lankybugger 13:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fancruft/listcruft. RobJ1981 05:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.