Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Drakengard characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Drakengard characters

An anon user User:84.184.85.201 User_talk:84.184.85.201 added an AfD banner to the article List of Drakengard characters but didn't create Articles for deletion/List of Drakengard characters. He or she posted the following message at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of Drakengard characters :

Reason for proposed deletion: Serious POV. Wrong information. Not enough information (the main character has less information then many of the minor characters) Information outside of the the article scope (listing of institutions). Gives Wikipedia itself as source. Necessary characters, institutions and concepts can be worked into the main article (they may have been there before someone created this article as an URV, where after it had been deleted). --84.184.85.201 09:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The anon user has also posted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FFXIclopedia (second nomination). I do not take a position yet on this AfD. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 10:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per the anon's nomination. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 12:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Game cruft. Merge it back to the original article. -- GWO
  • Then why are you voting delete? Merging doesn't require deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
    • That list is so badly written, it is not mergable with the main article. --84.184.110.108 10:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Additionally I do think, that neither the game nor its characters are notable enought to warrant several articles for it/them. The article itself isn't too large yet and would benefit from a section about the institutions and characters. I do not recommend merge since the list in question is POV in most parts and partially wrong(I'm the anon user in question. I couldn't create this page, that is why I took another recourse. Though I don't know why my comment on the other AfD is relevant?)--84.184.85.201 15:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.