Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Beatrice dedications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] List of Beatrice dedications
- – (View log)
Original research and violates Wikipedia is not a list of indiscriminate information. <3Clamster 01:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Merge to Beatrice Baudelaire (younger). This is clearly notable, but does not merit its own article.--Orthologist 09:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Why the younger Beatrice? Shouldn't it be merged with the older Beatrice's article, as this is the one Snicket talks about. By all means, merge it, but please don't delete it. Microchip08 11:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC) (original author).
- Also, it may be "original research", but what is wrong with that? It is correct research - surely it shouldn't matter if it is original or not? Microchip08 11:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm relisting this debate because my opinion of this article differs from the only response in this AfD. I'm withholding my opinion in case I end up closing this one anyway. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as the very essence of in-world trivia. It's not OR because it shows no thought at all, beyond the bare idea to make such a totally useless article. DGG 05:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Merge to the article about the book series. I don't think it even needs a redirect as anyone looking for info would go there first. --killing sparrows 00:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
