Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limpidity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - brenneman 01:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Limpidity

Limpidity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Does not meet WP:WEB guidelines for notability.

• The content itself has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.
• The website or content has not won a notable independent award from either a publication or organisation.
• The content is not distributed via a medium which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.

- Francis Tyers · 20:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per my own nomination. - Francis Tyers · 20:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless sourced, does not appear to meet any criteria of WP:WEB and a quick search brought up no independent sources. Trebor 22:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 02:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The thing's been running for over ten years, which IMO makes it inherently notable (very few webcomics can make such a claim). WP:WEB is just a guideline, we shouldn't be applying it with slavish literality like this. Bryan Derksen 08:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.