Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ligadua
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:23, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ligadua
1. In my entire have never heard of anyone called Ligadua.
2. " The royal drum is very important in Fijian society" this statement is pure fiction - and just what the hell is a royal drum?
3. "if Ligadua is not properly honored by the King, he will take away all the royal drums, and, by proxy, the king's authority" a statement completely devoid of meaning and factual basis.
This article has no references, and makes statements that are false.--Xorkl000 03:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm certainly no expert on Polynesian mythology, but the term gets 0 relevant Google hits, which is rather suspicious. Unless some verification is produced, I say delete. Dbtfz 04:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete If the sources previously quoted are considered unverifiable, trash the nonsense :) Avi 22:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- delete, if www.pantheon.org is the best reference you can find. They are extremely unreliable, especially as regards the Pacific, and regularly are the only sources for articles at AFD which have no factual basis (the most recent of which, IIRC, was Nganga). Grutness...wha? 05:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 08:00Z
Delete as unverifiable.--Ezeu 10:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)- Rename to Lingadua and rewrite.--Ezeu 09:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable. Robin Johnson 11:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable. —This user has left wikipedia 12:37 2006-01-23
- Delete as unverifiable. --Terence Ong 14:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Article on Fiji itself suggests that the King of Fiji and most indigenous Fijians are Christians; this makes the article's claims implausible. Smerdis of Tlön 16:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Mushintalk 17:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Latinus 21:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, besides being misspelled, it's a copyvio from pantheon.org. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.