Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon armstrong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Leon armstrong

This page looks suspicious to me. It had been previously speedied, then subsequently recreated a few hours later. While the article makes claims to notability, there are no references and I was unable to verify any of the claims (For the sake of full disclosure, I never left my house in my attempt to verify). D-Rock (Yell at D-Rock) 22:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete. 0 google hits for '"Leon armstrong" +"St Helens"', so hoax / nonsense. Flyboy Will 22:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as NN. Can't speedy as {{nn-bio}} / CSD A7 or {{db-repost}} / CSD G4 since article now claims notability. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 23:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy and protect. If it was recreated within a few hours, there's someone ensuring its existance. --Thephotoman 04:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — appears to be a slightly disguised rant. Even if true, there appears little about this individual to suggest notability: just a peeved local citizen who made some noises in the council meetings. :) — RJH 15:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as repost. Stifle 23:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.