Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego Knight's Kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Despite low participation, it's clear the hoax issue (the only deletion reason given) has been resolved. Mangojuice^talk 15:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lego Knight's Kingdom

As far as I can tell, this is an elaborate hoax. Some history: It was tagged speedy, I removed the tag because it wasn't appropriate and I actually thought the tag was added in error (see the history and you might see why). In any case, it had been added intentionally, but hoaxes are not speedy-able, so the same editor prodded it. An anon removed the prod with "not a hoax" as a summary, so we find ourselves here. I have to say, I can find no evidence that this movie is being planned whatsoever. There is no IMDB page, and this search returns essentially no hits. Anything is possible, but it seems extremely unlikely to me that a project being planned with stars of this magnitude would not leave a large Google footprint. Deville (Talk) 03:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong keep and possibly move to Monty Python & the Holy Grail in Lego. It's a real movie, though the official name is Monty Python & the Holy Grail in Lego [1] (Lego Knights is just a tentative title for the US release). It's also featured in the Monty Python & the Holy Grail special edition DVD set.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, nevermind, it seems the movie that the article is referring to is different from the one I'm talking about, though they do have the same names.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Alright I've moved the article to Monty Python & the Holy Grail in Lego and I've also cleaned it up so that it describes the real Lego Knights movie, thus the article is no longer a hoax.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.