Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazy K

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lazy K

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 03:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This one has some spread, warrants an article. · XP · 04:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete, I don't think it's that notable. JIP | Talk 15:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the following is a quote from the article. Another unusual quality of Lazy K is its flexibility of dialect. Lazy K can be written in a combinatory logic notation (like (K(SI(KK)))), Unlambda-like notation (`k``si`kk), Iota notation (**i*i*ii***i*i*i*ii*ii**i*i*ii*i*i*ii), or Jot notation (1111001111111000111111000111001110011110011100). Sorry but that makes no sense whatsoever. Its not vandalism is it? --Spartaz 22:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per it not being Unlambda. —Ruud 21:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.