Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Later On

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. —Korath (Talk) 13:50, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Later On

What is notable about this album? Brookie 18:57, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep. Album. Xezbeth 19:00, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Well, unless it's self-published or a mere collection of downloadable MP3s, the fact that an album has been released by the music industry is somewhat notable. I've edited out the review as it's POV, and the description of the cover as it's displayed in the picture. Keep, btw. Radiant! 21:06, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. CJCurrie 21:21, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree with Radiant! --Neigel von Teighen 21:21, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, released on his own record label, not notable - 390 Google hits. Megan1967 01:02, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep -- This album is 1 of 39 others by the same artist. An artist with 39 albums is quite notable. Longhair 02:17, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Has an allmusic.com entry and they give it 3 out of 5 stars. This is the first I've heard of this artist, but he appears to be very notable from what I've read on allmusic.com. Gamaliel 02:30, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as a notable album by a notable artist. Tuf-Kat 04:40, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The Recycling Troll 09:45, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.