Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laser Thinking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 23:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Laser Thinking

This reads like a get-rich-quick grow-your-our-business marketing/motivational pitch. Fplay 03:47, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete I'm sure if we looked hard enough, it'll turn out to be a copyvio anyway. Either way, exterminate. The JPS 10:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Acronym cruft. The article doesn't acknowledge that LASER is actually an acronym, so ... delete! --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 15:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable neologism. DeathThoreau 18:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete And also, it's incorrect. Unless laser thinking operates in a vacuum, it will diffuse like a flashlight beam also. Just over a longer distance.
• Delete per nom. -- JJay 20:39, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.