Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Large Animal Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Large_Animal_Games

Advertisement Cheese Sandwich 05:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unapologetic spam for nn software company --IslaySolomon 05:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Grumble. It's not an advertisement any longer. --TruthbringerToronto 05:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable organization. The page creator is also behind this, which should probably go too. Fireplace 05:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Still Delete. You can squeeze every last drop of bias out of the article it's still a non-notable company --IslaySolomon 05:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No claims of notability for company, WP:CORP refers.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as not meeting WP:CORP. [One] news article but nothing else to lend the company significance --Peripitus (Talk) 07:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, advertising cruft has been removed.—Pengo 11:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • OK, it's not advertising. Are they even remotely notable? -- Kicking222 11:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Just another maker of web games, like the thousands of others out there. -- Kicking222 11:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as not meeting WP:CORP. BlueValour 03:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.