Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Godiva Memorial Bnad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP, it's been transformed from the article nominated for deletion and at least the deleter asking for sources can be presumed satisfied. -Splash^talk 00:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lady Godiva Memorial Bnad

Non-Notable Has google hits [1], but allmusic doesn't have anything on them [2] Delete per WP:MUSIC KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 03:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Somewhat notable, but merge with Skule. - SimonP 04:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

• Your Google search was misspelt and had no quotes. This is better.-Splash^talk 04:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

• I spelt the google search as the article's title was written. The article notes that they spell their name that way as part of their gimmick. "They usually employ spelling with numerous intentional grammatical and typographical errors in any of their promotional material" KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 04:24, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

• Oh yes, my apologies. -Splash^talk 04:26, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

So, is it notable or not? I think it is, but merging with EngSoc is not a bad idea. What happens for other schools? The University_of_Michigan Engineering does not have separate articles for student groups. This debate should also apply to the Brute Force Committee (BFC) as it has a simular scope, size, notablilty, etc.s as the BNAD and has an article. Cafe Nervosa | talk 19:29, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

This AfD debate is being relisted in order to prompt a more thorough consensus. Please place new discussion below this line. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 13:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 16:40, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless sources can be given. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 16:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
• Please check out the recent changes (added today) 4:53, 12 December 2005 (sorry I don't know how to post properly) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.100.33.138 (talk • contribs) 09:54, December 12, 2005 (UTC).
  • Keep Recent edits are Good quality IMO. Cafe Nervosa | talk17:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Judging from the article content, delete looks wrong. If the voting ends in a delete (which looks very likely), the article should be merged, not simply deleted.—Gniw (Wing) 05:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  Keep — With the recent couple of major edits, deletion looks more and more wrong. This should have been put on stubify, not AfD.—Gniw (Wing) 04:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. While merging with University of Toronto Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering is tempting, that would result in an overly-long article. If we can have half a dozen pages about the Toronto Transit Commission, we can have more than one about goings-on at one of the largest universities in Canada. --Christopher Thomas 21:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Per reasons above G-Man 17:43, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This article has been given a thorough re-write, and is based on recorded fact from the Archivist of the University of Toronto Engineering Society. 17 December 2005 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adamgravitis (talk • contribs). (user's second edit)
• Keep. This is a great article! At worst it should be Merged. I never went to UofT, but I've heard of this years ago! Nfitz 20:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.