Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUElinks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 19:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] LUElinks

Delete--68.253.230.111 20:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC) NN website. Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:59, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: POV fork. Not the article, mind you ... the entire site is a POV fork of Gamefaqs.com --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 06:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as recreation of Lueshi, LUEshi, and a couple of other variants. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 07:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Duh, maybe I should actually *read* the article first. Still, delete per nom. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 07:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Site is only accessible by members, making this article original research and unverifiable. —Cryptic (talk) 07:59, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable, and not notable even if it's real (earlier versions have said it doesn't exist). Doesn't even seem to be mentioned in the main GameFAQs article. Has been deleted 8 times before, though the content was different (most were A1 speedies). Delete per WP:V and WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Starblind the entire "does not exist" thing is a long running joke between GameFAQs and LUELinks.Toffile 05:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - great website, but not notable enough for a wiki entry. You might want to protect it to...as someone will probabaly remake it for a 10th time.Toffile 05:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable - Tεxτurε 17:59, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Don't Delete - It has had a large enough influence to have its place upon Wikipedia, and its influence will only grow, not shrink. It is worth keeping. Mystalic 20:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  • User's first edit.--Toffile 00:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It is notable; it has thousands of members. We must share information about it. Cowpowder 21:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  • User has 8 edits. --Toffile 00:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - The article just needs to be cleaned up. A lot. Toad King 21:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  • User's first edit. --Toffile 00:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and protect from recreation. -Sean Curtin 06:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - nah, I'd say it's a notable site, even if it is closed registration. Yes, it does exist. And I'm sure there are people who go to it who are also Wikipedians, it's difficult to verify anything about it unless you're a member of LL itself. It's probably the most comprehensive links database on the net, even if it is a wee bit hard to get on to, and it is large enough to make a contribution to the internet's over all culture. And before anyone puts a snide little note below this post, I know I haven't made many edits. Thank you for noticing, and have a nice day. LupusCanis 19:12, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • User has 17 edits since (apparent) ergistration in May 2005. 2 in article space. --Toffile 01:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. mikka (t) 19:43, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - I am an individual expressing my opinion. --Statikeffeck 18:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • User has 6 edits.--Toffile 01:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - per Gtrmp's "delete and protect" Hbdragon88 01:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:WEB (by a long way), and is utterly unencyclopaedic to boot. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 20:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.